매달, 우리는 1000명 이상의 사람들이 시험 준비를 잘하고 시험을 잘 통과할 수 있도록 도와줍니다.
ITIL 4 Specialist: High-velocity IT Exam 온라인 연습
최종 업데이트 시간: 2026년04월21일
당신은 온라인 연습 문제를 통해 Peoplecert ITIL 4 Specialist High velocity IT 시험지식에 대해 자신이 어떻게 알고 있는지 파악한 후 시험 참가 신청 여부를 결정할 수 있다.
시험을 100% 합격하고 시험 준비 시간을 35% 절약하기를 바라며 ITIL 4 Specialist High velocity IT 덤프 (최신 실제 시험 문제)를 사용 선택하여 현재 최신 96개의 시험 문제와 답을 포함하십시오.
정답:
Explanation:
The scenario says the attack was identified quickly and systems were restored without significant loss. That means detection and corrective response were relatively effective. The weakness was that the attacker was able to gain access in the first place.
Therefore, the type of control needing improvement is prevention. This could include stronger identity protection, user awareness, multi-factor authentication, credential monitoring, and better social engineering resistance.
D is correct because the issue occurred before the detection stage; the preventive safeguards were insufficient.
정답:
Explanation:
HVIT is not only about speed. It also includes assured conformance, meaning the organization must move quickly while remaining compliant, secure, and governed. Risk management is the practice most directly concerned with understanding, assessing, and controlling uncertainties that could affect objectives, including regulatory and policy-related risks.
Service validation and testing is important for quality, but it is not the broadest practice for balancing delivery speed with compliance requirements. Monitoring and event management helps detect operational conditions. Problem management deals with causes of incidents. Risk management is the best overall fit for making CI/CD acceptable in a controlled and policy-aligned way.
So D is the best answer.
정답:
Explanation:
This is a classic omni-channel support issue. The main problem is fragmentation of information and interaction across channels. Integrating the communication channels allows shared context, consistent case tracking, and continuity of support regardless of how the user contacts the provider.
A may help with user experience but will not solve lost information across disconnected channels.
C incorrectly puts responsibility on users for a structural service issue.
D may improve categorization, but it can also increase fragmentation and does not address the repeated-information problem.
B is therefore the strongest answer because it improves the system of support, not just the behaviour of one group within it.
정답:
Explanation:
Version control is used to manage changes to defined artifacts in a controlled, traceable, and recoverable way. In infrastructure and platform management, one of the best examples is managing configuration settings during changes, especially where infrastructure as code or structured configuration management is used.
A is about security monitoring.
B is a maintenance activity.
C is automation, but the key aspect of version control is not merely writing a script; it is managing controlled versions of infrastructure-related definitions and settings.
D most directly reflects the use of version control for infrastructure state and configuration changes.
This also aligns with ITIL’s emphasis on information, tooling, and automation within practices.
정답:
Explanation:
When market needs are unpredictable and changing, the organization needs a way to continually sense, interpret, and refine understanding of stakeholder needs. Continual business analysis is the best fit because it keeps requirements aligned with evolving demand and business context.
A minimum viable product is useful for testing assumptions quickly, but the question specifically highlights difficulty understanding requirements over time. Kanban improves flow and visibility of work, but does not itself resolve ongoing uncertainty in market needs. Chaos engineering is about resilience in complex systems and is unrelated here.
B is strongest because it directly supports ongoing analysis of changing needs so that valuable features are less likely to be missed.
정답:
Explanation:
Service-dominant logic is the concept that best fits this description. It emphasizes that value is not simply delivered by one party to another. Instead, value is co-created through interaction, with each party contributing resources, knowledge, and capabilities.
Design thinking focuses on understanding users and solving problems creatively. Complexity thinking helps in dealing with uncertain and adaptive systems. Toyota Kata is about continual improvement and experimentation routines. Only service-dominant logic centers on reciprocal exchange of competencies for mutual benefit.
That is why D is the correct answer.
정답:
Explanation:
In HVIT, value is realized through outcomes that help the consumer achieve its goals, not merely through outputs or activities. Here, the goals are to increase revenue and improve customer experience. Statements 1 and 2 are the strongest evidence of those outcomes.
Using data analytics to sell more products shows a business outcome tied to revenue generation. Sending quick and personalized responses improves customer experience directly. By contrast, training on basic features is an enabling activity, not proof of realized value. More frequent reports may help management, but they do not directly demonstrate improved sales performance or customer experience.
This aligns with service value thinking in ITIL 4, where value is co-created through use and achieved outcomes rather than through the existence of the service alone.
정답:
Explanation:
Large and complex environments often fail in unexpected ways. Chaos engineering is a technique used to improve resilience by deliberately testing how systems behave under failure conditions. This helps organizations expose weaknesses, improve recovery mechanisms, and reduce user-impacting incidents over time.
A is not the best fit for reducing operational fragility.
C improves quality in delivery pipelines, but it does not directly test operational resilience in complex live-like environments.
D is a useful team agreement on completion criteria, but it is too limited for this scenario.
B is best because chaos engineering directly targets the uncertainty and fragility that often come with complex infrastructures, which is very consistent with HVIT’s resilience focus.
정답:
Explanation:
In HVIT, organizations should avoid one-size-fits-all decisions unless that decision is clearly justified by context. Different products, services, value streams, and customer segments may need different design approaches. The best improvement activity is first to assess organizational goals and customer requirements, then determine which design models are needed.
A may create standardization, but it assumes the most successful current team model will work everywhere. That is not necessarily true.
C focuses on resources instead of design effectiveness.
D focuses mainly on efficiency and duplication rather than customer outcomes and strategic alignment.
B best reflects ITIL thinking: start from objectives and stakeholder needs, then design an appropriate operating approach.
정답:
Explanation:
A loosely coupled architecture depends on clarity about what each component needs to do, the boundaries between components, and how user needs are expressed as workable requirements. Business analysis contributes by translating stakeholder and user needs into requirements that can be allocated appropriately across components.
A sounds more like architecture or design responsibility.
B relates more to service level management.
D is helpful in product thinking, especially for MVP work, but it is broader and less specifically tied to component-level contribution.
C is best because business analysis helps ensure that requirements are correctly understood and decomposed in a way that supports modular, independent, and loosely coupled design.
정답:
Explanation:
This question is about balancing two goals that often seem in tension in HVIT: high availability and high change velocity. Site reliability engineering (SRE) is specifically designed to balance innovation speed with reliability outcomes by using engineering practices, automation, error budgets, observability, and operational learning.
A is only a metric and not a full improvement approach.
B is useful, but event automation alone does not provide the broader balancing mechanism between reliability and delivery speed.
C can be valuable for resilience testing, but SRE is the more complete and operationally integrated answer for supporting both fast change and availability.
Therefore D is best because SRE directly addresses the need to sustain resilient services while enabling rapid and frequent change.
정답:
Explanation:
Resilient operations in HVIT depend not only on reacting to incidents but also on improving the underlying health of products and services. Technical debt directly affects system performance, scalability, maintainability, and stability. Assessing opportunities to reduce technical debt strengthens capacity and performance over time.
A is more closely linked to problem management.
B aligns more with knowledge management.
D may help by clarifying expectations, but it is less direct than actively identifying and removing structural weaknesses that harm performance and resilience.
HVIT encourages continual improvement and proactive investment in system health, not only short-term fixes. That makes C the most appropriate answer.
정답:
Explanation:
HVIT relies heavily on the four dimensions of service management being balanced in ways that support speed, reliability, and value co-creation. Among the choices, B is the strongest and most clearly aligned statement because automation is a core enabler of fast and reliable digital delivery.
The uploaded ITIL 4 practice-guide manual explicitly notes the importance of automation and tooling within practices and also highlights the guiding principle to optimize and automate. In HVIT, automated tools support testing, deployment, monitoring, workflow control, observability, and repeatability. This improves both velocity and consistency.
A is too rigid and conflicts with the more distributed, product-oriented, and collaborative models common in digital organizations.
C is too narrow and focuses on supplier control in a simplistic way.
D is incorrect because HVIT is not about ignoring data; it is about fast decisions with effective feedback, telemetry, and evidence.
정답:
Explanation:
HVIT places strong emphasis on culture, behaviour, shared understanding, and learning. Ethical behaviour is not created reliably by policy alone. Policy can set expectations, but real ethical capability comes from discussion, reflection, and repeated practice in ambiguous real-world situations.
Workshops that explore ethically significant scenarios help people understand trade-offs, build judgement, and align decisions with organizational values. That is much more effective than simply publishing a policy. Machine learning does not remove ethical responsibility; it can actually create more ethical risk if used without human judgement. Agile methods help speed and feedback, but they do not by themselves ensure ethical awareness.
So D is best because it develops ethical thinking as a lived organizational capability, which is much more aligned with HVIT culture.
정답:
Explanation:
In HVIT, organizations move quickly, but they must also learn rapidly from live failures and reduce the likelihood of recurrence. Problem management is the practice most directly concerned with identifying underlying causes of incidents and managing known errors and workarounds. That makes it the best answer when live errors are occurring and the organization needs protection from repeated impact.
Deployment management focuses on moving new or changed components into live environments, but it does not primarily address root cause analysis of recurring live issues. Business analysis helps clarify needs and requirements, which is useful earlier in the lifecycle, but not as the main control once live errors are already happening. Service continuity management is about preparedness for major disruptions and recovery scenarios, not routine or recurring product errors.
ITIL practice guidance describes problem management as reducing the likelihood and impact of incidents by identifying actual and potential causes and managing workarounds and known errors. That is why D is the best fit