Fortinet NSE 7 - Public Cloud Security 7.6.4 Architect 온라인 연습
최종 업데이트 시간: 2026년02월14일
당신은 온라인 연습 문제를 통해 Fortinet NSE7_CDS_AR-7.6 시험지식에 대해 자신이 어떻게 알고 있는지 파악한 후 시험 참가 신청 여부를 결정할 수 있다.
시험을 100% 합격하고 시험 준비 시간을 35% 절약하기를 바라며 NSE7_CDS_AR-7.6 덤프 (최신 실제 시험 문제)를 사용 선택하여 현재 최신 54개의 시험 문제와 답을 포함하십시오.

정답:

정답:
Explanation:
Based on the Fortinet NSE 7 - Public Cloud Security 7.4/7.6 curriculum and Azure Resource Manager (ARM) deployment logic, the what-if tool provides a predictive analysis of infrastructure changes.
Analyzing the Modification Symbols (Option B): The exhibit shows several critical changes being attempted simultaneously on the ServerApps_vnet.
VNet Address Space Change: The symbol - (Delete) is next to the address space 10.0.0.0/16, and + (Create) is next to 192.168.0.0/24.
Subnet Modification: Further down, the symbol ~ (Modify) indicates an attempt to change the prefix of an existing subnet from 10.0.1.0/24 to 10.0.2.0/24.
Azure Deployment Constraints: According to the FortiOS 7.6 Azure Administration Guide, Azure networking has strict dependencies. You cannot delete or modify an address space that contains active subnets or resources.
Why the deployment fails: The what-if output shows the administrator is trying to remove the 10.0.0.0/16 address range. However, the existing subnet 10.0.1.0/24 is still "resident" within that range during the transaction. Because the subnet is currently attached to the address space being deleted, Azure Resource Manager will reject the deployment as an invalid operation. The attempt to add a new 192.168.0.0/24 range does not resolve the conflict of removing the active range.
Why other options are incorrect:
Option A: The tool shows that 10.0.1.0/24 is being changed to 10.0.2.0/24, not that one is replacing the other as a new entity.
Option C: The symbols show a modification (~) of an existing subnet (index 0:), not the creation (+) of an entirely new subnet.
Option D: The VNet name ServerApps_vnet is not being changed; only its internal properties (tags, address space, and subnets) are being modified.

정답:
Explanation:
https://github.com/fortinet/fortigate-terraform-deploy
According to the Terraform documentation for installing Terraform on Linux, you need to download a zip archive that contains a single binary file called terraform. You need to unzip the archive and move the binary file to a directory that is included in your system's PATH environment variable, such as /usr/local/bin. This way, you can run the terraform command from any directory without specifying the full path.
If you do not move the binary file to the bin directory, you will get a command not found error when you try to run the terraform version command, as shown in the screenshot. To fix this error, you need to move the binary file to the bin directory or specify the full path of the binary file when running the command.

정답:

정답:
정답:
정답:
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From FortiOS 7.6, FortiWeb 7.4 Exact Extract study guide:
Based on the Fortinet NSE 7 - Public Cloud Security 7.4/7.6 study materials and the FortiOS 7.6 AWS Administration Guide, understanding the underlying mechanisms of AWS deployment tools is essential for permission management.
Infrastructure as Code and eksctl (Option C): In the context of Amazon EKS, the eksctl command-line tool is the official CLI for creating and managing clusters on EKS. When an administrator executes the eksctl create cluster command, eksctl does not interact with the EKS API directly to provision infrastructure; instead, it generates and executes AWS CloudFormation stacks to provision the necessary VPC, IAM roles, and the EKS control plane. Therefore, users running this command must have explicit permissions to create and manage CloudFormation stacks.
Resource Provisioning via Stacks: CloudFormation is AWS's native service for Infrastructure as Code (IaC), allowing users to define resources in JSON or YAML templates. Commands like eksctl leverage these templates to ensure repeatable and organized deployments of complex architectures, such as those required for a FortiGate or FortiWeb cloud integration.
Why other options are incorrect:
Option A: The kubectl command interacts directly with the Kubernetes API server inside the cluster to manage pods and services; it does not trigger AWS CloudFormation processes.
Option B: Helm is a package manager for Kubernetes. While it manages "releases" within the EKS cluster, the installation of a Helm chart for a FortiWeb ingress controller happens at the Kubernetes software layer and does not utilize AWS CloudFormation stacks.
Option D: Changing the node count via CloudShell using the AWS CLI or kubectl typically modifies an Auto Scaling Group or a Kubernetes Deployment/DaemonSet directly, rather than initiating a new CloudFormation stack execution.
정답:
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From FortiOS 7.6, FortiWeb 7.4 Exact Extract study guide:
In an AWS SD-WAN Transit Gateway (TGW) Connect topology, traffic flow must be meticulously orchestrated through VPC route tables to ensure that the FortiGate-VM (Security VPC) can inspect traffic transitioning between spokes.
Spoke to TGW Redirection (Option E): For traffic to leave a Spoke VPC and reach the inspection hub, the Spoke VPC internal routing table must be configured to send all non-local traffic (0.0.0.0/0) to the Transit Gateway (TGW). This is the first step in the traffic chain.
TGW to FortiGate Redirection (Option A): Once the traffic arrives at the TGW and is forwarded to the Security VPC via a TGW attachment, it lands in the TGW subnet (or attachment subnet). To ensure this traffic is inspected, the Security VPC TGW subnet routing table must point the default route (0.0.0.0/0) to the FortiGate's internal network interface (ENI).
FortiGate Return/Egress Path (Option D): After the FortiGate processes the packet, it must be sent back to the TGW to reach its final destination in a different spoke or to exit via a different gateway. Therefore, the Security VPC FortiGate internal subnet routing table (the subnet where the FortiGate's internal leg resides) must have a default route (0.0.0.0/0) pointing back to the TGW.
Why other options are incorrect:
Option B: If the Security VPC TGW subnet routing table points to the TGW as the next hop, it creates a routing loop where traffic arrives from the TGW and is immediately sent back without being inspected by the FortiGate.
Option C: Pointing all traffic to an Internet Gateway (IGW) would bypass the Transit Gateway entirely and send traffic to the public internet rather than through the internal security fabric.

정답:

정답:
정답:

정답:
정답:
정답:

정답: