Paloalto Networks SecOps-Pro 시험

Question No : 1

A large-scale phishing campaign has successfully compromised several user accounts within your organization, leading to lateral movement and data exfiltration. The incident response team is in the post-incident recovery phase.
Which of the following actions, combining Palo Alto Networks security principles and best practices, are crucial for long-term recovery and preventing similar future incidents? (Select all that apply)

• A.Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all user accounts, especially for VPN and critical application access.
• B.Leverage Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR to perform a comprehensive 'threat hunting' exercise across the environment for any remaining indicators of compromise (IOCs) and TTPs used by the attacker.
• C.Review and update Security Policy rules on the NGFW to enforce stricter application and user-based controls, specifically blocking high-risk applications identified in the attack.
• D.Conduct mandatory security awareness training for all employees, focusing on recognizing phishing attempts and reporting suspicious emails.
• E.Ensure all network devices and endpoints are patched to the latest versions and establish a robust patch management program.

답을 확인하기

정답:
Explanation:
All listed options are crucial for comprehensive recovery and future prevention after a major incident like a phishing campaign leading to data exfiltration.
A (MFA): Directly addresses account compromise, a primary vector in phishing.
B (Cortex XDR Threat Hunting): Ensures no lingering threats and helps understand the full scope of compromise, aiding eradication and future defense.
C (NGFW Policy Updates): Enhances network-level prevention and control based on lessons learned from the attack's lateral movement and data exfiltration methods.
D (Security Awareness Training): Addresses the human element, which is critical in preventing phishing successes.
E (Patch Management): While not directly related to phishing (unless the phishing delivered an exploit), strong patch management is fundamental to overall security posture and preventing future exploitation of vulnerabilities discovered during the incident.

Question No : 2

During a post-incident analysis of a sophisticated supply chain attack, the security team determines that the attacker modified a legitimate software update package on a third-party server, injecting a backdoor. Palo Alto Networks WildFire detected the malicious payload during the initial execution, but the compromise occurred before WildFire could fully block the download.
To prevent recurrence and enhance future defenses, what specific threat intelligence integration and policy modification on a Palo Alto Networks NGFW would be most effective?

• A.Enable SSL Decryption for all traffic and create a custom URL Filtering profile to block all unknown or uncategorized URLs.
• B.Integrate external threat intelligence feeds containing known malicious file hashes (e.g., from the supply chain attack) into the NGFW's 'External Dynamic Lists' and configure a security policy to block traffic to/from these indicators.
• C.Configure a strict 'File Blocking' profile to block all executable downloads from the internet, regardless of their source.
• D.Implement User-ID to enforce granular application access policies and enable App-lD to block all 'unknown-tcp' and 'unknown-udp' applications.
• E.Increase the WildFire cloud analysis timeout to ensure more thorough analysis of files before allowing them.

답을 확인하기

정답:
Explanation:
The core issue is a known malicious payload from a supply chain attack. Integrating external threat intelligence (B) directly addresses this by allowing the NGFW to dynamically block or alert on known malicious hashes and C2 IPs associated with the attack. While SSL Decryption (A) is good practice, blocking all unknown URLs is overly broad. File blocking (C) is too restrictive and could break legitimate operations. User- IDIApp-ID (D) are valuable for application control but don't directly prevent the download of known malicious files based on their hashes. Increasing WildFire timeout (E) would delay delivery but might not entirely prevent a highly evasive, targeted payload if it bypasses WildFire's initial analysis or is a zero-day.

Question No : 3

An organization relies heavily on Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR for security orchestration, automation, and response. A major incident involving ransomware has encrypted critical data across multiple departments. During the eradication phase, the incident response team needs to deploy a custom script to remove persistence mechanisms left by the ransomware and distribute a decryption tool. This script needs to run on hundreds of affected endpoints.
Which XSOAR playbook command or integration would be most suitable and efficient for this task, ensuring proper execution and feedback?
A)



B)



C)



D)



E. Manually log into each affected endpoint and run the cleanup script.

• A.Option A
• B.Option B
• C.Option C
• D.Option D
• E.Option E

답을 확인하기

정답:
Explanation:
Option D is the most suitable and efficient. XSOAR excels at automating tasks across a large number of endpoints. The '!exec- remote-command' (or similar endpoint-management integration command, depending on the specific endpoint integration) allows for remote execution of scripts on designated systems, which is exactly what's needed for eradication.
Option A is for communication.
Option B is for incident creation, not execution.
Option C shows a generic API call, but without a specific integration handling ‘endpoint.execute_script’, it's not as direct as ‘exec-remote-command'.
Option E is highly inefficient and impractical for hundreds of endpoints.

Question No : 4

Your organization utilizes Palo Alto Networks XDR for unified security operations. An alert indicates a suspicious PowerShell script executing on a critical server, with an observed network connection to an uncommon external IP address.
The XDR alert provides the following details:



Given this information, what is the most immediate and critical next step in the incident response process, and why? Assume '192.0.2.100' is an untrusted external IP.

• A.Decode the PowerShell encoded command to understand the malware's full functionality and then update antivirus signatures.
• B.Isolate the compromised server from the network using XDR's containment capabilities to prevent further compromise or lateral movement.
• C.Initiate a full vulnerability scan on the server to identify the initial compromise vector.
• D.Collect forensic artifacts (memory dumps, disk images) from the server for in-depth analysis later.
• E.Notify senior management and legal counsel about the potential breach before taking any action.

답을 확인하기

정답:
Explanation:
The encoded PowerShell command and external network connection strongly suggest active compromise and C2 communication. The most immediate and critical step is containment to prevent further damage. Isolating the server (B) using XDR's capabilities directly addresses this by stopping the threat's spread. Decoding the command (A) and collecting forensics (D) are important but come after containment. Vulnerability scanning (C) is a post-incident activity or part of proactive security, not an immediate response to an active compromise. Notifying management (E) is part of communication but not the first technical response.

Question No : 5

A sophisticated APT group has compromised a critical financial institution's network, employing custom malware that uses polymorphic obfuscation and DGA for C2 communication. The security team discovers unusual outbound DNS requests and network anomalies.
During the initial incident detection phase, which of the following actions, leveraging Palo Alto Networks capabilities, would be most effective in confirming the compromise and gathering initial intelligence for incident response?

• A.Immediately block all outbound DNS traffic to unknown domains from the affected network segment to contain the threat.
• B.Configure a custom Anti-Spyware profile on the Palo Alto Networks NGFW to look for specific DGA patterns identified by threat intelligence feeds and enable packet capture on suspicious connections.
• C.Execute a full-scale forensic image of all affected workstations and servers before any further network analysis to preserve evidence.
• D.Quarantine the affected network segment from the rest of the organization to prevent lateral movement, then initiate a vulnerability scan.
• E.Deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) agents to all endpoints and wait for automated alerts to confirm the compromise.

답을 확인하기

정답:
Explanation:
While other options have merit in later stages, option B is most effective for initial confirmation and intelligence gathering. Blocking all DNS (A) could disrupt legitimate services. Forensic imaging (C) is crucial but premature for initial confirmation. Quarantining (D) is a containment step, not an initial detection/intelligence gathering one. Waiting for EDR alerts (E) is reactive; proactive configuration (B) on the NGFW, leveraging threat intelligence for DGA, allows for real-time identification and packet capture for immediate analysis and confirmation of C2 communication, which is vital for understanding the threat's nature.

Question No : 6

During the 'Post-lncident Activity' phase of the NIST Incident Response Plan, an organization discovers that a complex multi-stage attack involving advanced persistent threat (APT) techniques successfully exfiltrated highly sensitive data. The post-mortem analysis reveals gaps in threat intelligence integration and automated response capabilities.
Which of the following improvements, aligning with Palo Alto Networks security practices, would best address these identified gaps to strengthen future 'Preparation' and 'Detection and Analysis' phases for similar advanced threats?

• A.Implement Cortex XSOAR playbooks to automatically enrich alerts with AutoFocus and WildFire intelligence, and orchestrate targeted responses (e.g., quarantining endpoints, blocking C2 domains on NGFW) based on high-confidence IOC matches.
• B.Conduct an organization-wide audit of all unpatched software and immediately apply all outstanding patches to minimize the attack surface.
• C.Increase the frequency of full network vulnerability scans and penetration tests, focusing on external perimeter defenses.
• D.Deploy additional next-generation firewalls at every internal network segment to enforce granular micro-segmentation policies.
• E.Focus solely on strengthening email security gateways with more aggressive spam and phishing filters.

답을 확인하기

정답:
Explanation:
The 'Post-lncident Activity' phase includes lessons learned and improvements. The scenario specifically points to 'gaps in threat intelligence integration and automated response capabilities' for complex multi-stage attacks.
- A: Implementing Cortex XSOAR playbooks with AutoFocus and WildFire integration directly addresses both gaps. XSOAR automates the enrichment of alerts with context from global threat intelligence (AutoFocus, WildFire) and orchestrates automated responses, significantly enhancing the 'Detection and Analysis' accuracy and the speed/efficiency of 'Preparation' by defining automated actions for future similar incidents. This is precisely about integrating intelligence and automating responses.
- B, C, D, and E are all valid security improvements, but they do not directly address the specific gaps identified (threat intelligence integration and automated response) as effectively as XSOAR and its capabilities. Patching (B), scans (C), and micro-segmentation (D) are about reducing attack surface and improving network controls, while email security (E) focuses on one attack vector. While beneficial, none specifically enhance the integration of threat intelligence for analysis or automate complex, multi-tool responses to APTs like XSOAR does.

Question No : 7

Consider the following Python code snippet for a custom script designed to automate threat intelligence ingestion and security policy updates on a Palo Alto Networks firewall:



This script is intended for proactive 'Preparation' and reactive 'Containment' within the NIST framework.
What is the most significant flaw in the provided update_security_policy function regarding its ability to reliably and efficiently update a Palo Alto Networks firewall with new threat intelligence for a 'Containment' action, especially when dealing with a rapidly evolving threat or a large volume of indicators, and how would it impact the firewall's performance or policy management?

• A.The script does not handle the case where the AddressGroup does not exist, causing an error during addr_group. refresh().
• B.Creating individual Address objects for each new IP and then adding them one by one to the AddressGroup is inefficient and leads to excessive API calls and commit times for large lists of IPs, impacting firewall performance during critical containment phases.
• C.The script only updates the destination of the security rule and does not consider updating the source, services, or actions, which might be necessary for comprehensive containment.
• D.The fw. call is placed inside the try-except block, meaning commit errors might not be properly handled, leaving the firewall in an inconsistent state.
• E.The use of f-strings for naming address objects (f Malicious_IP_{ip. replace( '. ', ‘_’)}) could lead to name collisions if IPs are similar after replacement.

답을 확인하기

정답:
Explanation:
The most significant flaw for reliable and efficient containment, especially with large or rapidly evolving threat intelligence, is option B. Creating individual Address objects and adding them one by one results in a separate API call for each new IP. When dealing with hundreds or thousands of indicators, this generates an excessive number of API calls and significantly prolongs the commit time. Palo Alto Networks firewalls are optimized for bulk operations. For dynamic threat intelligence, it's far more efficient to use a Dynamic Address Group (DAG) or External Dynamic List (EDL) which can consume a text file or URL feed of IPs, minimizing API calls and commit operations, thus ensuring faster and more efficient containment without impacting firewall performance. While other options point to potential issues, none are as critical for the performance and scalability of automated containment with threat intelligence as the inefficiency of individual object creation for large datasets.

Question No : 8

A SOC receives an alert from Cortex XDR indicating a suspicious PowerShell command executed on an endpoint, matching a known TTP for a ransomware campaign. The 'Preparation' phase of the NIST Incident Response Plan is crucial for an effective response. Considering this scenario, what aspects of the 'Preparation' phase are most directly demonstrated as beneficial in enabling a rapid and effective 'Detection and Analysis' and 'Containment' response?

• A.Developing and regularly updating a comprehensive Incident Response Playbook that includes specific steps for ransomware, utilizing Cortex XDR automation capabilities.
• B.Ensuring all security tools, including Cortex XDR, are fully integrated and configured to share threat intelligence bidirectionally with WildFire andAutoFocus.
• C.Conducting annual organization-wide phishing simulations and security awareness training for all employees.
• D.Establishing clear communication channels and roles/responsibilities within the incident response team and external stakeholders (e.g., legal, PR).
• E.Maintaining up-to-date hardware and software inventories, along with critical asset identification and classification.

답을 확인하기

정답:
Explanation:
The 'Preparation' phase sets the foundation for efficient incident response. All options are aspects of preparation, but some directly impact Detection/Analysis and Containment more than others in this specific scenario:
- A: A well-developed playbook with Cortex XDR automation (e.g., playbooks for ransomware containment) directly guides and speeds up response actions, impacting both detection analysis and containment.
- B: Integration of security tools (Cortex XDR, WildFire, AutoFocus) allows for faster threat correlation, automated analysis of suspicious files, and rapid deployment of new protections, directly supporting Detection and Analysis and enabling effective Containment by leveraging shared threat intelligence.
- C: Phishing simulations and awareness training are preventive measures, part of preparation, but they don't directly facilitate technical detection, analysis, or containment once an incident is ongoing.
- D: Clear communication channels and defined roles/responsibilities (who does what, who to inform) are fundamental for coordinating a rapid and effective response, impacting all phases, especially Containment, by ensuring swift decision-making.
- E: Up-to-date inventories and asset classification are crucial for understanding the impact (Detection/Analysis) and prioritizing containment efforts, ensuring the right assets are protected first. Knowing what you have helps you detect anomalies and contain effectively.

Question No : 9

A Zero-Day exploit targets a widely used application within an organization, leading to a successful initial compromise. The security team detects anomalous network traffic patterns via their Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW) and identifies the specific compromised host. During the 'Containment' phase of the NIST Incident Response Plan, which strategic and tactical action(s) should be prioritized to limit the blast radius and gather critical threat intelligence simultaneously, considering the zero-day nature of the attack?
(Select all that apply)

• A.Immediately apply a custom URL filtering profile on the NGFW to block all outbound connections from the compromised host, except to designated forensic servers.
• B.Utilize Cortex XDR to isolate the compromised host from the network, preventing lateral movement, while enabling enhanced logging for detailed telemetry capture.
• C.Deploy a temporary 'sinkhole' configuration on the NGFW for the suspected C2 domain identified from threat intelligence, redirecting malicious traffic to a controlled environment for further analysis.
• D.Push out a global emergency patch for the vulnerable application across all enterprise endpoints, even if the patch is still in beta.
• E.Notify all affected users via email about the incident and instruct them to change their passwords immediately.

답을 확인하기

정답:
Explanation:
The 'Containment' phase is critical for limiting the scope of an incident.
For a zero-day, simultaneously limiting spread and gathering intelligence is key.
- A: Custom URL filtering (or Security Policies) for the compromised host is a precise network-level containment that still allows forensic data exfiltration to controlled systems.
- B: Cortex XDR isolation is crucial for endpoint containment, preventing lateral movement, and enabling enhanced logging ensures detailed telemetry for post-incident analysis and new IOC generation.
- C: A sinkhole configuration is an advanced containment and intelligence-gathering technique for C2 traffic, allowing the SOC to understand the attacker's capabilities without further compromise.
- D: Pushing a beta patch globally is highly risky and violates standard change management, potentially causing more disruption.
- E: Notifying users immediately and instructing password changes might be part of recovery or communication but is not a primary technical containment step for the zero-day exploit itself.

Question No : 10

During the 'Recovery' phase of the NIST Incident Response Plan, after a data exfiltration incident, a SOC analyst needs to ensure the integrity of critical data and systems before bringing them back online.
Which of the following technical validation steps, incorporating Palo Alto Networks capabilities, is crucial for a robust recovery and prevents re-infection?

• A.Restore data from the latest backup, then perform a full network vulnerability scan using an external scanner to identify remaining open ports.
• B.Deploy a new set of firewall rules that block all outbound traffic from the recovered segment, then conduct user training on phishing awareness.
• C.After restoring systems, leverage Cortex XDR's post-infection analysis to scan for any residual malicious files or processes, and cross-reference logs with WildFire verdicts for newly seen executables.
• D.Confirm service availability by pinging critical servers and checking website uptime, then update all system passwords across the organization.
• E.Implement an entirely new network architecture, replacing all compromised hardware, before restoring any data.

답을 확인하기

정답:
Explanation:
The 'Recovery' phase involves restoring affected systems and services.
Option C is key for robust recovery and preventing re- infection. Simply restoring from backup (A) doesn't guarantee the backup itself wasn't compromised or that new malware wasn't introduced during recovery. Using Cortex XDR's post-infection analysis for residual threats and correlating with WildFire verdicts ensures that restored systems are clean from known and potentially new (zero-day) malware, providing a high level of confidence before full reintegration. Blocking all outbound traffic (B) is too restrictive for recovery, and user training is for prevention. Pinging servers (D) is a basic availability check, not a security validation. Implementing a completely new network architecture (E) is an extreme and often impractical step for most recovery scenarios.

Question No : 11

A sophisticated APT group bypasses initial network defenses and establishes persistence on a Windows domain controller by creating a scheduled task that executes a PowerShell script disguised as a legitimate system utility. Cortex XDR identifies anomalous process creation and lateral movement attempts. As a Palo Alto Networks Security Operations Professional, during the 'Eradication' sub-phase of the NIST Incident Response Plan, what highly effective and advanced action(s) would you prioritize, assuming you have confirmed the PowerShell script's malicious nature and its persistence mechanism, while minimizing business disruption?

• A.Immediately disable the affected domain controller's network interface and proceed with a full server re-image.
• B.Use Cortex XDR's Live Response to remotely terminate the malicious PowerShell process, delete the scheduled task, and then deploy a custom IOC exclusion rule for the identified script hash.
• C.Modify the firewall security policy to block all PowerShell traffic on all domain controllers and then roll back to a previous known good backup of the domain controller.
• D.Initiate a full memory dump of the domain controller and send it to an external forensic lab for deep analysis, delaying eradication until results are returned.
• E.Push a generic endpoint security update across the entire organization to patch all potential vulnerabilities.

답을 확인하기

정답:
Explanation:
The 'Eradication' phase focuses on removing the root cause of the incident.
Option B is the most precise and effective. Using Cortex XDR's Live Response allows for surgical removal of the malicious process and persistence mechanism (scheduled task) without taking the critical domain controller offline, minimizing business disruption. Deploying a custom IOC exclusion rule ensures that if the script reappears (e.g., from another compromised host), it's immediately identified and blocked. Disabling the DC (A) or re-imaging (C) causes significant disruption and might not be necessary if the exact persistence is known and removed. Sending memory dumps (D) delays eradication, and generic updates (E) are reactive and not specific to the identified threat.

Question No : 12

During an incident response exercise, a security analyst identifies a phishing email successfully delivered to a user's inbox, containing a malicious attachment. The user has not yet opened the attachment. In the 'Containment, Eradication, and Recovery' phase of the NIST Incident Response Plan, which sequence of actions, specifically utilizing Palo Alto Networks security features, would be most effective and appropriate?

• A.Isolate the user's endpoint using Cortex XDR's Live Terminal, then perform a network-wide antivirus scan, and finally notify the user to delete the email.
• B.Block the sender's email address on the email gateway, delete the email from the user's inbox (if possible via email security solution), and then initiate a WildFire analysis of the attachment to update threat intelligence.
• C.Disable the user's network access, reimage their machine, and then conduct a user awareness training session.
• D.Perform a full forensic analysis of the user's hard drive, identify the attacker's IP, and then block that IP on the perimeter firewall.
• E.Report the incident to law enforcement and await their instructions before taking any action.

답을 확인하기

정답:
Explanation:
The 'Containment, Eradication, and Recovery' phase aims to stop the spread, remove the root cause, and restore services. Blocking the sender and deleting the email (B) are immediate containment and eradication steps for an un-opened malicious email. Initiating WildFire analysis is crucial for updating threat intelligence and preventing similar future attacks, aligning with eradication and future prevention. Isolating the endpoint (A) is a containment step, but a network-wide scan might be too broad at this stage without confirmed compromise, and notifying the user to delete is less effective than forced deletion. Reimaging (C) is overkill if the attachment wasn't opened. Forensic analysis (D) is typically part of eradication/post-incident analysis once the immediate threat is contained. Reporting to law enforcement (E) is a post-incident activity, not an immediate containment step.

Question No : 13

A Security Operations Center (SOC) using Palo Alto Networks (PAN-OS) next-generation firewalls observes a sudden surge in outbound DNS requests to unusual top-level domains from a critical internal server. Threat intelligence feeds indicate recent campaigns leveraging DNS exfiltration. In the context of the NIST Incident Response Plan, which of the following actions best aligns with the 'Detection and Analysis' phase for this scenario, preceding further containment efforts?

• A.Immediately block all outbound DNS traffic from the affected server using a PAN-OS Security Policy Rule.
• B.Initiate a full packet capture on the firewall for all traffic from the affected server and analyze DNS query content for suspicious patterns, while also correlating with DNS Security logs.
• C.Isolate the server from the network and begin forensic imaging, assuming compromise has occurred.
• D.Notify executive leadership about a potential breach and prepare a public statement.
• E.Update all antivirus signatures on endpoints across the entire network.

답을 확인하기

정답:
Explanation:
The 'Detection and Analysis' phase focuses on determining if an event is an incident, its scope, and nature. While blocking traffic (A) might be a containment step, immediate full packet capture and correlation with DNS Security logs (B) provide crucial data for analysis without prematurely impacting legitimate services, which is essential for accurate incident classification. Isolating the server (C) and notifying leadership (D) are typically 'Containment, Eradication, and Recovery' or 'Post-Incident Activity' steps, and updating antivirus signatures (E) is a general security hygiene practice, not a primary detection and analysis step for a specific observed anomaly.

Question No : 14

The SOC team is evaluating a new vendor claiming 'True AI-powered Threat Intelligence integration.' Their current process involves manual review of threat intelligence feeds and then manually updating firewall rules or SIEM correlation rules. The CISO wants to understand how 'True AI' would fundamentally transform this process beyond what simple scripting or basic ML-based keyword extraction can achieve.
Which of the following represents the most advanced and distinct 'AI' capability in this context, moving beyond ‘ML’?

• A.The AI system uses supervised ML to classify threat intelligence articles into categories (e.g., malware, APT, vulnerability) for easier analyst sorting.
• B.The AI system employs Natural Language Generation (NLG) to summarize threat intelligence reports into concise, actionable bullet points for analysts.
• C.The AI system leverages Natural Language Understanding (NLU) and knowledge graphs to read and comprehend unstructured threat intelligence, automatically extracting TTPs, IOCs, and actor profiles, then reasoning about their relevance to the organization's specific assets and threat posture, dynamically generating and deploying adaptive defense mechanisms (e.g., new firewall policies, endpoint hardening rules) with minimal human intervention. This demonstrates symbolic AI and autonomous reasoning.
• D.The AI system uses reinforcement learning to optimize the frequency of threat intelligence feed updates based on the historical impact of new intelligence on incident reduction.
• E.The AI system applies unsupervised ML to discover novel correlations between seemingly disparate IOCs from various threat intelligence sources.

답을 확인하기

정답:
Explanation:
The challenge is to go 'beyond what simple scripting or basic ML-based keyword extraction can achieve' and demonstrate 'True AI.' Options A, B, and E describe advanced applications of ML (classification, summarization, correlation), but they primarily focus on processing and presenting information. While valuable, they don't fundamentally change the paradigm of 'understanding' and 'acting' based on complex, evolving intelligence.
Option D describes an AI optimization capability, but not the core transformation of intelligence integration.
Option C represents the pinnacle of AI in this context. It describes the ability of the system to understand (NLLJ), reason (symbolic AI, knowledge graphs), and act autonomously (dynamic policy generation and deployment) based on complex, unstructured threat intelligence. This moves beyond merely processing data to truly comprehending context, relevance, and autonomously adapting defenses, which is a key differentiator of advanced AI from I ML. The system doesn't just extract keywords; it builds a semantic understanding and then reasons about how to apply that understanding to the specific environment.

Question No : 15

A global SOC, utilizing Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud, is struggling with alert fatigue from containerized environments. They have thousands of containers, many transient, making traditional rule-based and even some ML-based anomaly detections unreliable. The CISO proposes leveraging 'AI-driven' security to address this.
Which of the following aspects of AI, beyond just ML, would be most critical for effectively securing such a dynamic, ephemeral environment, and why?

• A.AI's ability to run supervised ML models on historical container logs to predict future vulnerabilities.
• B.AI's focus on statistical anomaly detection to baseline 'normal' behavior for each container instance, flagging deviations. This is primarily an unsupervised ML capability.
• C.AI's inherent capability to understand the dynamic relationships and dependencies between microservices, container images, hosts, and network flows in real- time, building a 'knowledge graph' of the entire environment. This enables contextual reasoning and risk prioritization for ephemeral assets, which goes beyond isolated ML detections.
• D.AI's use of deep learning to analyze raw network traffic between containers for malicious patterns, bypassing the need for explicit protocol parsing.
• E.AI-driven automation of security policy enforcement (e.g., automatically applying least privilege to new containers), which is essentially smart orchestration.

답을 확인하기

정답:
Explanation:
Securing highly dynamic, ephemeral containerized environments is exceptionally challenging for traditional and even isolated ML approaches because baselines constantly shift and context is paramount.
Option C highlights a key differentiator of advanced AI: the ability to build and maintain a dynamic 'knowledge graph' or semantic understanding of the entire environment including ephemeral relationships, dependencies, and context across layers (container, host, network, application). This allows for contextual reasoning and risk prioritization, understanding not just 'what' is happening, but 'where' it is happening in the overall architecture and 'why' it might be malicious or benign given the broader context. This holistic, relational understanding and reasoning capability is beyond simple statistical anomaly detection (ML) on isolated data points and is crucial for effective security in such complex, dynamic environments.
Options A, B, D, and E describe valuable ML or automation features, but they don't capture this higher-level, relational intelligence and contextual reasoning unique to more advanced AI applications in this domain.