매달, 우리는 1000명 이상의 사람들이 시험 준비를 잘하고 시험을 잘 통과할 수 있도록 도와줍니다.
Endpoint Security Complete Implementation - Technical Specialist 온라인 연습
최종 업데이트 시간: 2025년01월12일
당신은 온라인 연습 문제를 통해 Broadcom 250-586 시험지식에 대해 자신이 어떻게 알고 있는지 파악한 후 시험 참가 신청 여부를 결정할 수 있다.
시험을 100% 합격하고 시험 준비 시간을 35% 절약하기를 바라며 250-586 덤프 (최신 실제 시험 문제)를 사용 선택하여 현재 최신 75개의 시험 문제와 답을 포함하십시오.
정답:
Explanation:
In the Symantec Security Cloud Console, using multiple domains enables organizations to manage separate entities within a single environment while ensuring data isolation and independence. This structure is beneficial for organizations with distinct operational divisions, subsidiaries, or independent departments that require separate administrative controls and data boundaries.
Symantec Endpoint Security Documentation outlines how multiple domains help maintain data privacy and secure access management across entities, allowing each domain to operate independently without crossover, which ensures compliance with data segregation policies.
정답:
Explanation:
When the Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager (SEPM) is enrolled in the Integrated Cyber Defense Manager (ICDm), certain policies are exclusively managed from the cloud, with the Network Intrusion Prevention policy as one of them. This arrangement centralizes control over specific security aspects to ensure consistent and unified policy application across cloud-managed endpoints, reinforcing a streamlined and efficient cloud-based administration model.
Reference in Symantec Endpoint Protection Documentation emphasize that Network Intrusion
Prevention, once SEPM is integrated with ICDm, is governed centrally from the cloud to leverage real-time threat intelligence updates and broader, managed protection capabilities directly.
정답:
Explanation:
When defining Location Awareness for the Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP) client, administrators should focus on criteria that can uniquely identify a network or environment characteristic to trigger specific policies.
Two important criteria are:
NIC Description: This criterion allows SEP to detect which Network Interface Card (NIC) is in use, helping to determine whether the endpoint is connected to a trusted internal network or an external/untrusted network. NIC description is a straightforward attribute SEP can monitor to determine location.
WINS Server: By detecting the WINS (Windows Internet Name Service) server, SEP can identify whether the endpoint is within a specific network environment. WINS server settings are often unique to particular locations within an organization, aiding in policy application based on network location.
Reference in Symantec Endpoint Protection Documentation outline using such network and connection-specific criteria to optimize Location Awareness policies effectively. The Location Awareness Configuration Guide provides best practices for configuring SEP clients to adapt behavior based on network characteristics, ensuring enhanced security and appropriate access controls across different environments.
정답:
Explanation:
In the Assess Phase of the Symantec Endpoint Security Complete (SESC) Implementation Framework, two key stages are critical to establishing a thorough understanding of the environment and defining requirements.
These stages are:
Planning: This initial stage involves creating a strategic approach to assess the organization’s current security posture, defining objectives, and setting the scope for data collection. Planning is essential to ensure the following steps are organized and targeted to capture the necessary details about the current environment.
Data Gathering: This stage follows planning and includes actively collecting detailed information about the organization’s infrastructure, endpoint configurations, network topology, and existing security policies. This information provides a foundational view of the environment, allowing for accurate identification of requirements and potential areas of improvement.
Reference in SES Complete Documentation highlight that successful execution of these stages results in a tailored security assessment that aligns with the specific needs and objectives of the organization. Detailed instructions and best practices for conducting these stages are covered in the Assessing the Customer Environment and Objectives section of the SES Complete Implementation Curriculum.
정답:
Explanation:
In cybersecurity, the term "Living off the land" (LOTL) refers to adversaries using legitimate tools and software that are already present within a target’s environment to conduct malicious activity. This approach allows attackers to avoid detection by using trusted applications instead of bringing in new, suspicious files that might be flagged by endpoint security solutions.
Definition and Usage Context
"Living off the land" is a method that leverages tools, utilities, and scripting environments typically installed for administrative or legitimate purposes. Attackers prefer this approach to minimize their visibility and avoid triggering endpoint detection mechanisms that rely on recognizing foreign or malicious executables. Tools like PowerShell, Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI), and command-line utilities (e.g., cmd.exe) are frequently employed by attackers using this strategy.
Tactics in Endpoint Security Complete Implementation
Within an Endpoint Security Complete implementation framework, LOTL is specifically recognized in contexts where endpoint solutions need to monitor and distinguish between legitimate use and misuse of standard administrative tools. This approach is often documented in the Detection and Prevention phases of Endpoint Security Implementation, where specific focus is given to monitoring command-line activities, auditing PowerShell usage, and identifying anomalous behavior tied to these tools.
Impact and Mitigation
LOTL can complicate detection efforts because security solutions must discern between legitimate and malicious uses of pre-existing tools. Symantec Endpoint Security Complete counters this by using behavior-based analysis, anomaly detection, and machine learning models to flag unusual patterns, even when no new files are introduced.
Relevant Reference in SES Complete Documentation
Detailed guidance on addressing LOTL tactics within Symantec Endpoint Security Complete is often found in the documentation sections covering Threat Hunting and Behavior Analytics. These resources outline how the platform is designed to flag suspicious usage patterns within native OS tools, leveraging telemetry data and known indicators of compromise (IoCs) for early detection.
정답:
Explanation:
The final task during the project close-out meeting is to obtain a formal sign-off of the engagement. This step officially marks the completion of the project, confirming that all deliverables have been met to the customer’s satisfaction.
Formal Closure: Obtaining sign-off provides a documented confirmation that the project has been delivered as agreed, closing the engagement formally and signifying mutual agreement on completion.
Transition to Support: Once sign-off is received, the customer is transitioned to standard support services, and the project team’s responsibilities officially conclude.
Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:
Option A (acknowledging achievements) and Option D (discussing support activities) are valuable but do not finalize the project.
Option B (handing over documentation) is part of the wrap-up but does not formally close the engagement.
Therefore, obtaining a formal sign-off is the final and essential task to conclude the project close-out meeting.
정답:
Explanation:
The main focus when defining adoption levels required for features in SES Complete is on Customer requirements. This approach ensures that the deployment of security features aligns with the customer’s specific needs and priorities.
Aligning with Business Needs: By focusing on customer requirements, adoption levels are set based on the security goals, operational needs, and the specific environment of the customer.
Tailored Implementation: Adoption levels vary depending on the organization’s risk tolerance, technical landscape, and strategic goals. Meeting these unique requirements ensures maximum value from the solution.
Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:
Option B (Technical specifications) and Option C (Regulatory compliance) are considerations, but they support rather than define adoption levels.
Option D (Competitor analysis) is not typically relevant to adoption level decisions within an implementation framework.
Therefore, Customer requirements are the primary focus for defining adoption levels in SES Complete.
정답:
Explanation:
Within Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager (SEPM), Exceptions and Intrusion Prevention are two policy types that can be configured to manage endpoint security.
Here’s why these two are included:
Exceptions Policy: This policy type allows administrators to set exclusions for certain files, folders, or processes from being scanned or monitored, which is essential for optimizing performance and avoiding conflicts with trusted applications.
Intrusion Prevention Policy: This policy protects against network-based threats by detecting and blocking malicious traffic, playing a critical role in network security for endpoints.
Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:
Option B (Host Protection) and Option E (Process Control) are not recognized policy types in SEPM.
Option C (Shared Insight) refers to a technology within SEP that reduces scanning load, but it is not a policy type.
Thus, Exceptions and Intrusion Prevention are valid policy types within Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager.
정답:
Explanation:
In the Manage phase, information about the validation of in-use features/functions can be found in the Test Plan. This document outlines the specific tests, criteria, and methods for verifying that the solution’s features and functions are operating as expected.
Validation Purpose of the Test Plan: The Test Plan specifies the steps to validate that each configured feature is performing correctly and meeting the intended objectives.
Documentation of Test Results: It also includes documentation of results, which helps ensure that all features remain functional and aligned with requirements in the production environment.
Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:
Option A (Solution Infrastructure Design) and Option B (Solution Configuration Design) focus on setup and configuration rather than validation.
Option D (Business or Technical Objectives) are used for setting goals, not validating functionality.
The Test Plan is thus the correct source for information on validating in-use features/functions during the Manage phase.
정답:
Explanation:
The first phase of the SES Complete Implementation Framework is the Assess phase. This phase involves gathering information about the customer’s environment, identifying business and technical requirements, and understanding the customer’s security objectives.
Purpose of the Assess Phase: The goal is to fully understand the customer’s needs, which guides the entire implementation process.
Foundation for Solution Design: This phase provides essential insights that shape the subsequent design and implementation stages, ensuring that the solution aligns with the customer’s requirements.
Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:
Option B (Design) follows the Assess phase, where the gathered information is used to develop the solution.
Option C (Operate) and Option D (Transform) are later phases focusing on managing and evolving the solution post-deployment.
Thus, the Assess phase is the correct starting point in the SES Complete Implementation Framework.
정답:
Explanation:
Adaptive Protection is designed to reduce the attack surface by managing suspicious behaviors performed by trusted applications. This feature provides dynamic, behavior-based protection that allows trusted applications to operate normally while monitoring and controlling any suspicious actions they might perform.
Purpose of Adaptive Protection: It monitors and restricts potentially harmful behaviors in applications that are generally trusted, thus reducing the risk of misuse or exploitation.
Attack Surface Reduction: By focusing on behavior rather than solely on known malicious files, Adaptive Protection effectively minimizes the risk of attacks that exploit legitimate applications.
Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:
Option A (Malware Prevention Configuration) targets malware but does not specifically control trusted applications’ behaviors.
Option B (Host Integrity Configuration) focuses on policy compliance rather than behavioral monitoring.
Option D (Network Integrity Configuration) deals with network-level threats, not application behaviors.
Therefore, Adaptive Protection is the feature best suited to reduce the attack surface by managing suspicious behaviors in trusted applications.
정답:
Explanation:
The analysis of SES Complete Infrastructure primarily applies to on-premise or hybrid infrastructures. This is because SES Complete often integrates both on-premise SEP Managers and cloud components, particularly in hybrid setups.
On-Premise and Hybrid Complexity: These types of infrastructures involve both on-premise SEP Managers and cloud components, which require careful analysis to ensure proper configuration, security policies, and seamless integration.
Integration with Cloud Services: Hybrid infrastructures particularly benefit from SES Complete’s capability to bridge on-premise and cloud environments, necessitating detailed analysis to optimize communication, security, and functionality.
Applicability to SES Complete’s Architecture: The SES Complete solution is designed with flexibility to support both on-premise and cloud environments, with hybrid setups being common for organizations transitioning to cloud-based services.
Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:
Option A (Cloud-based) does not fully apply as SES Complete includes significant on-premise components in hybrid setups.
Option C (Virtual infrastructure) and Option D (Mobile infrastructure) may involve endpoint
protection but do not specifically align with the full SES Complete infrastructure requirements.
Thus, the correct answer is on-premise or hybrid infrastructure.
정답:
Explanation:
Researching the customer before arriving onsite is important to understand the customer’s specific needs and how the technology can address those needs. This preparation enables the consultant to make relevant connections between the customer’s unique environment and the capabilities of the SES solution.
Understanding Customer Needs: By researching the customer, consultants can gain insight into specific security challenges, organizational goals, and any unique requirements.
Tailoring the Approach: This understanding allows consultants to tailor their approach, present the technology in a way that aligns with the customer’s needs, and ensure the solution is relevant to the customer’s environment.
Building a Collaborative Relationship: Demonstrating knowledge of the customer’s challenges and goals helps establish trust and shows that the consultant is invested in providing value.
Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:
Option A (reviewing documentation) and Option B (understanding recent challenges) are steps in preparation but do not encompass the full reason.
Option C (aligning expectations) is a part of understanding customer needs but is not the primary purpose.
The best answer is to understand the customer and connect their needs to the technology.
정답:
Explanation:
In a multi-site SEP Manager implementation, if one SEP Manager replication partner fails, the clients for that site automatically connect to the remaining SEP Managers. This setup provides redundancy, ensuring that client devices maintain protection and receive policy updates even if one manager becomes unavailable.
Redundancy in Multi-Site Setup: Multi-site SEP Manager deployments are designed with redundancy, allowing clients to failover to alternative SEP Managers within the environment if their primary replication partner fails.
Continuous Client Protection: With this failover, managed devices continue to be protected and can still receive updates and policies from other SEP Managers.
Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:
Option B (delayed replication) and Option C (discontinued protection) are incorrect as replication stops only for the failed manager, and client protection continues through other managers.
Option D suggests data retention locally without failover, which is not the standard approach in a multi-site setup.
Therefore, the correct answer is that clients for the affected site connect to the remaining SEP Managers, ensuring ongoing protection.
정답:
Explanation:
For an organization with remote locations and minimal bandwidth that wants a content distribution solution without configuring an internal LiveUpdate server, using a Group Update Provider (GUP) is the best choice.
Efficient Content Distribution: The GUP serves as a local distribution point within each remote location, reducing the need for each client to connect directly to the central management server for updates. This minimizes WAN bandwidth usage.
No Need for Internal LiveUpdate Server: The GUP can pull updates from the central SEP Manager and then distribute them to local clients, eliminating the need for a dedicated internal LiveUpdate server and optimizing bandwidth usage in remote locations.
Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:
Option A (External LiveUpdate) would involve each client connecting to Symantec’s servers, which could strain bandwidth.
Option B (Management Server) directly distributing updates is less efficient for remote locations with limited bandwidth.
Option C (Intelligent Updater) is typically used for manual updates and is not practical for ongoing, automated content distribution.
Thus, the Group Update Provider is the optimal solution for remote locations with limited bandwidth that do not want to set up an internal LiveUpdate server.