Internal Audit Practitioner 온라인 연습
최종 업데이트 시간: 2025년02월13일
당신은 온라인 연습 문제를 통해 IIA IIA-IAP 시험지식에 대해 자신이 어떻게 알고 있는지 파악한 후 시험 참가 신청 여부를 결정할 수 있다.
시험을 100% 합격하고 시험 준비 시간을 35% 절약하기를 바라며 IIA-IAP 덤프 (최신 실제 시험 문제)를 사용 선택하여 현재 최신 100개의 시험 문제와 답을 포함하십시오.
정답:
Explanation:
Definition of Detective Controls:
Detective controls are designed to identify errors, irregularities, or fraudulent activities after they occur, enabling corrective action.
Reasoning:
Option B is correct because reconciliations compare records (e.g., bank statements against ledgers) to detect discrepancies.
Option A (segregation of duties) and Option C (required authorizations) are preventive controls designed to stop errors or fraud before they occur.
Role of Detective Controls:
Detective controls play a critical role in monitoring and identifying issues, supporting the overall control environment.
정답:
Explanation:
Reference to IIA Standards:
Standard 1110 - Organizational Independence: Organizational independence is achieved when the CAE reports functionally to the board or audit committee and administratively to the CEO or equivalent.
Reasoning:
Option C is correct because administrative reporting to the CEO ensures the CAE has access to resources, support, and operations without impairing functional independence.
Option A and Option B describe functional reporting lines (e.g., approval of the audit charter and plans), which are distinct from administrative reporting.
Significance of Reporting Structure:
Administrative reporting ensures the day-to-day management of the internal audit function, while
functional reporting maintains independence and alignment with governance.
정답:
Explanation:
Reference to the IIA Code of Ethics - Confidentiality:
The principle of confidentiality requires internal auditors to respect and protect the value of information obtained during the course of their work and to avoid using it for personal gain.
Reasoning:
Option A is correct because refusing to use audit information for personal financial gain directly aligns with the principle of confidentiality.
Option B relates to competency and professional judgment, not confidentiality.
Option C pertains to avoiding conflicts of interest, which is an example of the principle of objectivity.
Application of Confidentiality:
Internal auditors must safeguard sensitive information and use it solely for legitimate audit purposes.
정답:
Explanation:
Reference to IIA Standards:
Standard 2420 - Quality of Communications: Reports should be accurate, objective, clear, concise, constructive, and complete.
Findings must be presented factually and free from assumptions or bias.
Reasoning:
Option A is correct because it presents the purpose, timing, and findings in a clear and professional manner, allowing management to take informed action.
Option B lacks balance and shifts responsibility for identifying root causes to management without actionable recommendations.
Option C includes a biased assumption, undermining the report’s objectivity and professionalism.
Impact of Quality Communication:
High-quality communications support decision-making by presenting findings and recommendations constructively.
정답:
Explanation:
Reference to IIA Standards:
Standard 1120 - Individual Objectivity: Internal auditors should avoid situations that impair their ability to provide unbiased assurance.
Practice Advisory 1130.A1-1: Objectivity is impaired if auditors audit activities they previously managed within the last 12 months.
Reasoning:
Option A is correct because the auditor’s recent role in the audited area creates a conflict of interest and threatens objectivity.
Option B does not impair objectivity; leveraging prior knowledge is permissible if applied objectively.
Option C (consulting services two years prior) does not impair objectivity due to the elapsed time.
Mitigating Actions:
Auditors with recent involvement in an audited area should disclose the conflict and be reassigned to preserve objectivity.
정답:
Explanation:
Reference to IIA Standards:
Standard 2120 - Risk Management: Internal audit must assess and evaluate the risk management processes of the organization.
Identifying risk scenarios supports engagement objectives by determining vulnerabilities and threats to process objectives.
Reasoning:
Option A is correct because risk scenarios provide insights into potential events or conditions that could hinder achieving objectives. This allows auditors to assess risk exposure and evaluate controls effectively.
Option B (control effectiveness) is a subsequent step in the audit process but does not explain the need for identifying risk scenarios.
Option C focuses on evaluating management’s process, which is broader than identifying specific risks for the engagement.
Practical Application:
Risk scenarios guide auditors in tailoring their approach to address areas of greatest vulnerability.
정답:
Explanation:
Definitions from Risk Management Frameworks (e.g., COSO ERM):
Inherent Risk: The raw or natural level of risk before any controls or mitigating actions are applied. Residual Risk: The remaining level of risk after implementing controls or risk responses. Reasoning:
Option C is correct because it captures the essence of inherent risk as the baseline risk level and residual risk as the mitigated level after control actions.
Option A inaccurately states that residual risk is tied to the completion of a risk assessment process instead of mitigation actions.
Option B confuses inherent risk with risk appetite, which reflects the organization’s tolerance for risk.
Significance of Differentiation:
Understanding both risk levels helps prioritize resources for managing critical risks and improving controls.
정답:
Explanation:
Reference to IIA Standards:
Standard 1120 - Individual Objectivity: Internal auditors must perform engagements with honesty and without any bias.
Serving in an operational or management role in the area being audited within the past year can impair objectivity, as the auditor may unconsciously favor or critique processes they were involved in developing or managing.
Reasoning:
Option B is correct because recent involvement in the audited area could compromise objectivity, leading to potential conflicts of interest or biased assessments.
Option A (integrity) is less likely impacted, as integrity relates to adherence to ethical principles and honesty.
Option C (competency) is not affected, as the individual’s skills and knowledge remain intact regardless of the recency of their involvement.
Mitigating Actions:
The chief audit executive (CAE) should evaluate and address potential impairments to objectivity, possibly assigning the auditor to a different engagement.
정답:
Explanation:
Reference to Audit Report Elements:
Criteria: The benchmark or standard used for comparison during the audit (e.g., policies, regulations, contracts).
Condition: The factual observation or evidence identified during the audit. Effect: The impact or consequence of the condition on the organization. Reasoning:
Option C is correct because the procurement policy specifies authorized limits, serving as the standard (criteria) against which compliance is assessed.
Option B (condition) refers to the actual state of observed controls, processes, or compliance, not the benchmark.
Option A (effect) describes the potential or realized impact of non-compliance but not the standard itself.
Importance of Criteria:
Criteria provide a clear benchmark, ensuring that findings are communicated with context and
actionable insights.
정답:
Explanation:
Reference to IIA Standards:
Standard 2410 - Criteria for Communicating: Recommendations should be provided where appropriate to address identified issues and improve processes.
Standard 1100 - Independence and Objectivity: Providing recommendations does not impair independence as long as the auditor does not implement them.
Reasoning:
Option B is correct because providing recommendations based on objective observations is part of an internal auditor's role in adding value and improving operations.
Option A unnecessarily avoids recommendations, misinterpreting independence requirements.
Option C incorrectly suggests that the auditor cannot provide input; while management owns the implementation, the auditor’s recommendations can guide effective solutions.
Adding Value Through Recommendations:
Recommendations are a critical output of the audit process, guiding management to address inefficiencies and improve operations.
정답:
Explanation:
Reference to IIA Standards:
Standard 2200 - Engagement Planning: The engagement work program outlines the resources, timelines, and procedures necessary to achieve the engagement’s objectives.
The work program must be approved to ensure alignment with objectives and resource requirements.
Reasoning:
Option B is correct because an approved engagement work program confirms that the scope, procedures, and resources were planned and allocated effectively.
Option A (staff skills audit) evaluates team competencies but does not confirm specific resource allocation for an engagement.
Option C (post-engagement survey) evaluates the outcome of the audit but does not provide evidence of initial resource planning.
Significance of the Work Program:
The work program ensures that the engagement is structured to meet objectives efficiently, with adequate and relevant resources.
정답:
Explanation:
Reference to Criteria:
Definition: Criteria are the standards, policies, or benchmarks used to evaluate the subject matter during an audit.
IIA Standard 2410 - Criteria for Communicating: Audit reports should clearly state criteria to ensure findings are relevant and actionable.
Reasoning:
Option B is correct because it references the organization’s policies and procedures, which serve as the criteria for evaluating compliance.
Option A describes the condition (what was observed), not the criteria. Option C describes the effect (the impact of the observed condition). Importance of Criteria in Audit Reporting:
Including criteria provides a basis for comparison, helping stakeholders understand why a finding is significant and how it deviates from expectations.
정답:
Explanation:
Reference to Internal Control Assessment:
Standard 2130 - Control: Internal auditors must evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of controls in mitigating risks.
COSO Framework: Proper segregation of duties is essential for preventing unauthorized transactions and fraud.
Reasoning:
Option B is correct because the lack of management review and approval for creating vendors indicates a control weakness, as it creates opportunities for unauthorized vendors or fraud. The auditor should investigate whether mitigating controls exist (e.g., periodic review of vendor lists) or recommend redesigning the process to include managerial oversight.
Option A dismisses the observation without considering its impact on control adequacy. Prompt payment alone does not address risks related to unauthorized vendors.
Option C incorrectly assumes the observation reflects adequate controls, which is not the case given the lack of management approval.
Actionable Next Steps:
Document the observation as a control deficiency.
Perform additional testing to identify whether compensating controls mitigate the risk or recommend enhancements to strengthen controls.
정답:
Explanation:
Reference to IIA Standards:
Standard 2420 - Quality of Communications: Audit communications must be accurate, objective, clear, concise, constructive, complete, and timely.
A fair and balanced assessment ensures objectivity and builds credibility.
Reasoning:
Option B is correct because fair and balanced reporting reflects both positive and negative findings, maintaining the credibility and usefulness of the audit report.
Option A (including as much detail as possible) risks overwhelming the audience and detracting from key messages.
Option C (using technical language) can reduce clarity and accessibility for non-technical stakeholders.
Importance of Balanced Reporting:
Objective and balanced communications ensure that the audit report is actionable and supports informed decision-making by management and the board.
정답:
Explanation:
Reference to IIA Standards:
Standard 2200 - Engagement Planning: Internal auditors must develop a plan that considers the objectives, risks, and controls of the area being audited.
Standard 2210 - Engagement Objectives: The objectives of the engagement must be aligned with the organization's processes and risk management practices.
Reasoning:
Option C is correct because understanding the process's objectives and associated risks allows the auditor to design procedures to assess how well risks are managed and objectives are achieved.
Option A (mission, vision, and strategic objectives) provides organizational context but does not give detailed insights into the specific process.
Option B (management's opinion) is subjective and insufficient for developing a comprehensive understanding of the process.
Effective Engagement Planning:
Focus on process-specific objectives, risks, and controls ensures a targeted and effective audit, contributing to meaningful outcomes.